Observations

Pensées of Mauritian aphorist Malcolm de Chazal:

  • Birdsong is always in pitch. Birds sound wrong only when frightened.
  • The underbrush makes the light chubby.
  • A trotting dog: his hind legs knit and his forelegs crochet.
  • Night softens the mind’s irritations and inflames the body’s.
  • The mouth and eyes are each anagrams of the other.
  • An animal’s feet are as intelligent as a man’s hands.
  • Women make us poets, children make us philosophers.
  • A cat purrs himself to sleep, being the only creature who sings his own lullaby.
  • Shadows round everything out. The lacework of light is based on a circular pattern.
  • Good taste has no fixed rules, though fashion has. Taste amounts to being fashionable with a sense of style.
  • The eyes of the overly fearful stammer.
  • Servants eventually come to resemble their masters. “Professional” churchgoers end up looking like priests.
  • Suffering doesn’t ennoble unless there is greatness to begin with.

And “Number is the alphabet of form, which is why children always want to touch whatever they count.”

Homeward

Perhaps the most touching story is told by a Canadian, Flight-Commander R. Leckie, D.S.O., in a letter home, published in an American paper. After an engagement with hostile aircraft over the North Sea he came down, his seaplane riddled with shrapnel, over fifty miles from land, and then had to act as rescuer and host to the crew of an aeroplane, wrecked by engine failure. Six men were then adrift in a doomed machine, with no food and little water. The Commander had four pigeons; one was released at once, a second on the next day, a third on the third day. All failed to reach home, perishing over the waste of waters. The fourth, set free in a fog, hungry and thirsty, struggled over the fifty miles of sea without a landmark and without a rest. He could not reach his loft, but fluttered down in a coastguard station, and there fell dead from exhaustion. But his message was delivered, and six men were saved.

Bird Notes and News, Winter 1918

Reciprocity Redux

sallows reciprocity post

From Lee Sallows:

“The above three strips of ten numbers have an intriguing property. They record how many times each of the decimal digits (shown at left) occur in the other two strips. Hence the 6 in the left-hand strip identifies the number of 0’s in strips B and C, while the 2 in the centre strip counts the number of 3’s present in strips A and C. Moreover, the same property holds for every number in all three strips.”

See Reciprocation.

(Thanks, Lee.)

In a Word

hippomaniacally
adv. in a manner reminiscent of a mad horse

frample
v. of a horse: to paw the ground

accoy
v. to quiet or soothe

tournure
n. graceful manner or bearing

In an 1884 letter, Augustus Hare noted that the Bishop of Lichfield drove horses named Pride and Prejudice. “He says people may consider it a terrible thing for a bishop to be drawn hither and thither by these passions, but then it is assuredly a fine thing to have them well under control.”

Plan A

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ste01945.jpg

The Greek architect Dinocrates proposed carving Mount Athos into a colossal man who held a city in one hand and with the other poured a river into the sea.

Alexander the Great rejected the proposal because (among other things!) it would have required importing grain by ship rather than growing it near the city.

Travel Literature

For decades, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. kept a record of the books he read. Pleasingly, the last entry is Thornton Wilder’s 1935 novel Heaven’s My Destination.

In Winter Rules, George Gardner Herrick claims that the book was not to be found in Holmes’ library in Washington or Massachusetts. I can’t confirm that, though.

Sort of related: The definition of confection in Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary of the English Language contains this quotation:

Of best things then, what world shall yield confection
To liken her?
Shakespeare.

In 1893 a correspondent to Notes and Queries pointed out that this passage appears nowhere in Shakespeare. “I have just now found it in [Sir Philip Sidney’s] ‘Arcadia,’ book i, the eclogue of Thyrsis and Dorus. Clearly he quoted from memory. What a memory the man had! — and how careless he sometimes was in trusting it.”

Misc

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sitta_villosa1.jpg

  • NUTHATCH and UNTHATCH are nearly the same word.
  • Vladivostok is farther south than Venice.
  • Thackeray called George IV’s prose style “lax, maudlin slipslop.”
  • dollop reads the same upside down.
  • “I shall stipulate that I will only go into Heaven on condition that I am never in a room with more than ten people.” — Edward Lear

R.I.P.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portret_van_Georges_Boulanger,_Frans_generaal_en_minister,_RP-F-F01142-BJ.jpg

One of the most moving epitaphs I ever read — actually it is an inscription — is in Ixelles cemetery, Brussels, on the tomb of a girl who had been the mistress of Gen. Georges Boulanger, a former War Minister of France. She died in July 1891; that September, heartbroken, Boulanger made the supreme romantic gesture, one that many, many bereft lovers have threatened, but very, very few have carried through: He shot himself at her tomb. He is buried beside her, and his last, impassioned cry rings out in bronze:

AI-JE BIEN PU VIVRE
2 MOIS 1/2 SANS TOI!

(‘How did I live two and a half months without you!’) Romeo said nothing more poignant.

— J. Bryan, Hodgepodge: A Commonplace Book, 1986

On the Money

In their 1943 handbook The Reader Over Your Shoulder, Robert Graves and Alan Hodge note that writers are prone to exaggerate descriptions of quantity and duration. “There should never be any doubt left as to how much, or how long.” They offer this quantified example:

(100%) Mr. Jordan’s fortune consisted wholly of bar-gold.
(99%) Practically all his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(95%) His fortune consisted almost entirely of bar-gold.
(90%) Nearly all his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(80%) By far the greater part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(70%) The greater part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(60%) More than half his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(55%) Rather more than half his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(50%) Half his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(45%) Nearly half his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(40%) A large part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(35%) Quite a large part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(30%) A considerable part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(25%) Part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(15%) A small part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(10%) Not much of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(5%) A very small part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(1%) An inconsiderable part of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.
(0%) None of his fortune consisted of bar-gold.

“This simple, generally accepted, scale is confused by writers who, for dramatic effect, try to make 5% seem more than it is.”