Early Adopter

At the start of H.G. Wells’ 1895 novella The Time Machine, the Time Traveller explains to his friends that “any real body must have extension in four directions: it must have Length, Breadth, Thickness, and — Duration.” This idea, of conceiving time as a fourth dimension, had been broached in the 18th century, but it had first been treated seriously in a mysterious letter to Nature in 1885:

“I [propose] to consider Time as a fourth dimension of our existence. … Since this fourth dimension cannot be introduced into space, as commonly understood, we require a new kind of space for its existence, which we may call time-space.”

The letter writer identified himself only as “S.” Was this Wells? Apparently not: In his 1934 Experiment in Autobiography Wells wrote, “In the universe in which my brain was living in 1879 there was no nonsense about time being space or anything of that sort. There were three dimensions, up and down, fore and aft and right and left, and I never heard of a fourth dimension until 1884 or there-about. Then I thought it was a witticism.”

So someone had anticipated Wells’ idea by a full decade. As far as I know, his identity has never been discovered.

(Via Paul J. Nahin, Holy Sci-Fi!, 2014.)

Round and Square

This rank impossibility by Kokichi Sugihara won second prize in the Neural Correlate Society’s 2016 illusion of the year contest.

The key is that the top of each cylinder is not a planar curve. Dickinson College mathematician David Richeson has created an interactive applet that you can use to examine the shape, and see his paper below for an explanation of the math and the template of a paper model.

(David Richeson, “Do the Math!: Sugihara’s Impossible Cylinder,” Math Horizons 24:1 [September 2016], 18-19.)

Reciprocity Redux

sallows reciprocity post

From Lee Sallows:

“The above three strips of ten numbers have an intriguing property. They record how many times each of the decimal digits (shown at left) occur in the other two strips. Hence the 6 in the left-hand strip identifies the number of 0’s in strips B and C, while the 2 in the centre strip counts the number of 3’s present in strips A and C. Moreover, the same property holds for every number in all three strips.”

See Reciprocation.

(Thanks, Lee.)

Org Chart

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:72_Goeta_sigils.png
Image: Wikimedia Commons

Say what you will about hell, it’s very well organized. According to the 17th-century grimoire Ars Goetia, the underworld is ruled by 72 demons, each with its own sigil (above) and served by a sort of infernal bureaucracy:

Aim (also Aym or Haborym) is a Great Duke of Hell, very strong, and rules over twenty-six legions of demons. He sets cities, castles and great places on fire, makes men witty in all ways, and gives true answers concerning private matters. He is depicted as a man (handsome to some sources), but with three heads, one of a serpent, the second of a man, and the third of a cat to most authors, although some say of a calf, riding a viper, and carrying in his hand a lit firebrand with which he sets the requested things on fire.

Wikipedia has a page explaining who does what.

Related: Belphegor’s prime, 1000000000000066600000000000001, is a palindromic prime number with 666 at its heart and 13 zeros on either side. It was discovered by Harvey Dubner; Clifford Pickover named it after a prince of hell responsible for helping people make ingenious inventions and discoveries.

It’s A Small World After All

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:String_girdling_Earth.svg
Image: Wikimedia Commons

A popular mathematical puzzle asks: Suppose Earth were perfectly spherical and wrapped with a string at the equator. If we wanted to raise the string 1 meter off the ground, all around the world, how much longer would it need to be?

Surprisingly, the answer is only about 6.3 meters. A circle of radius r has a circumference of 2πr. We’re adding a meter to the radius, so the circumference increases by 2π meters.

Even more remarkably, this remains true regardless of the size of the sphere. Above, the increase in the circumference (blue) remains the same for a sphere of any size — it’s determined entirely by the additional radius (red).

The shape need not even be a sphere! Below, when the string is raised one meter (red) outward from the perimeter of either square, the string’s total length increases only by the combined length of the four blue arcs, which together equal the circumference of a circle of radius 1, or 2π meters.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:String_girdling_square.svg
Image: Wikimedia Commons

Monkey Don’t

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chimpanzee_seated_at_typewriter.jpg

The infinite monkey theorem holds that a monkey typing at random for an infinite amount of time will almost certainly produce the works of Shakespeare.

This may be true, but mathematicians Stephen Woodcock and Jay Falletta of the University of Technology Sydney find that it would take an extraordinarily long time — longer, in fact, than the life span of the universe.

Assuming a typing speed of one character per second on a 30-key keyboard, they find, a single chimp has only about a 5 percent chance of typing BANANAS in its own lifetime. And even the entire global population of 200,000 chimps will almost certainly never string together the 884,647 words that make up Shakespeare’s works within 10100 years.

“There are many orders of magnitude difference between the expected numbers of keys to be randomly pressed before Shakespeare’s works are reproduced and the number of keystrokes until the universe collapses into thermodynamic equilibrium,” the authors conclude. “As such, we reject the conclusions from the Infinite Monkeys Theorem as potentially misleading within our finite universe.”

Speaking of Shakespeare: Grand Theft Hamlet is a British documentary about the staging of a production of Hamlet inside Grand Theft Auto:

Winner of the Jury Award for best documentary feature at the 2024 SXSW Film Festival, it will be released in the U.K. in December and globally early next year.

(Thanks, John.)

The Unknotting Problem

The least knotted of all knots is a simple closed loop, the “unknot.” Certainly this is easy to spot on its own, but adding even a few twists can make it hard to recognize:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unknots.svg

An elaborately draped loop can be quite difficult to distinguish from a knottier knot. Is this an unknot?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thistlethwaite_unknot.svg

(Yes, it is.)

Surprisingly, while research is ongoing, it remains unknown whether the challenge of recognizing unknots is efficiently solvable — whether an algorithm can accomplish the task in polynomial time. It’s an open question.

The Bristol Bridges Walk

https://reallygross.de/ops/bridgewalk

In the 18th century Leonhard Euler famously addressed the question whether it was possible to walk through the city of Königsberg and return to one’s home having crossed each of seven bridges exactly once.

The answer, briefly, was no, but in 2013 network scientist Thilo Gross noticed that the city of Bristol has a similar layout, and here the task is possible: If you’re willing to walk 30 miles, you can cross each of the 45 bridges on this map and return to your starting point.

Details here.

Hard to Say

A paradox by Columbia University logician Haim Gaifman:

line 1: The sentence on line 1 is not true.
line 2: The sentence on line 1 is not true.
line 3: The sentence on line 2 is not true.
line 4: The sentence on line 3 is not true.
line n + 1: The sentence on line n is not true.

All these sentence are equivalent, because each essentially restates its predecessor. Since the sentence on line 1 isn’t true, the sentence on line 3 isn’t true either. “[B]ut what I have just stated is not true, because it is the sentence on line 4 (or an obviously equivalent reformulation of it), and also this last statement of mine is not true, because it is the sentence on line 5, etc. None of these sentences can be successfully asserted, because none of them is true; but again I find myself slipping into nontruth: what I have just said is not true for it obviously includes the conjunction of these very same sentences; and also this last assertion is not true, and so on ad infinitum.”

(Haim Gaifman, “Pointers to Truth,” Journal of Philosophy 89:5 [May 1992], 223-261. See Yablo’s Paradox.)

Misc

  • Angkor Wat and Machu Picchu are roughly antipodal.
  • WONDER is UNDERWAY in Pig Latin.
  • By convention, current flows from positive to negative in a circuit; electrons, which are negatively charged, move in the opposite direction.
  • The immaculate conception describes the birth of Mary, not Jesus.
  • “A man’s style in any art should be like his dress — it should attract as little attention as possible.” — Samuel Butler

10/22/2024 UPDATE: Interesting addendum from reader Mark Thompson: The capital cities Asunción, Canberra, and Kuwait City are nearly equidistant on great-circle routes:

Kuwait City to Canberra: 12,768 km
Canberra to Asunción: 12,712 km
Asunción to Kuwait City: 12,766 km

“Their mutual distances apart (along the earth’s surface) happen to be very close to one Earth-diameter [12,742 km]: so, sadly, they don’t all lie on a single great circle (since pi is not 3).” (Thanks, Mark.)