Science Marches On

An “infallible remedy against epilepsy,” published in Paris in 1686:

Take of common polypody dried and powdered, of moss growing from the skull of a man who died by violent means (criminals preferred), of nail-filings from human hands and feet, two drachms each; piony root half an ounce, and of fresh misletoe half an ounce. Boil them together as the moon wanes; cool, strain, and administer in small doses.

Cited in Charles White, Three Years in Constantinople, 1846.

See Well, Hey!

Long Addition

http://books.google.com/books?id=TLoNAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA38&dq=snark+butcher+beaver&as_brr=1&ei=2nBXSb_pE5fUzATGnoA_#v=onepage&q=snark%20butcher%20beaver&f=false" title="2009-10-23-long-addition

In The Hunting of the Snark, the Butcher confirms for the Beaver that Two and One are Three:

Taking Three as the subject to reason about–
A convenient number to state–
We add Seven, and Ten, and then multiply out
By One Thousand diminished by Eight.

The result we proceed to divide, as you see,
By Nine Hundred and Ninety and Two:
Then subtract Seventeen, and the answer must be
Exactly and perfectly true.

Fittingly for Carroll, the math works:

snark math

Hey!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ojodemarte.jpeg

If Martians are observing us, how can we show them we’re intelligent?

Carl Friedrich Gauss proposed marking a huge right triangle on the Siberian plain; Austrian astronomer Joseph von Littrow suggested carving a perfect circle in the Sahara and filling it with burning kerosene.

Joseph Pulitzer favored a more direct approach: He wanted to build a huge billboard in New Jersey recommending his newspaper to inquiring Martians.

He pressed the idea until an assistant asked, “What language shall we print it in?”

Perron’s Paradox

Let N be the largest positive integer. Then either N = 1 or N > 1.

If N > 1 then N2 > N, which breaks our definition of N as the largest integer. Therefore N = 1.

“The implications of this paradox are devastating,” writes Laurence Chisholm Young. “In seeking the solution to a problem, we can no longer assume that this solution exists. Yet this assumption has been made from time immemorial, right back in the beginnings of elementary algebra, where problems are solved by starting off with the phrase: ‘Let x be the desired quantity.'”

What’s in a Name

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Baptist_Weenix_-_Portrait_of_Ren%C3%A9_Descartes.jpg

The disciples of Descartes made a perfect anagram upon the Latinised name of their master, ‘Renatus Cartesius,’ one which not only takes up every letter, but which also expresses their opinion of that master’s speciality–‘Tu scis res naturae’ (Thou knowest the things of nature).

— William T. Dobson, Poetical Ingenuities and Eccentricities, 1882

Jackpot

A guaranteed way to win at roulette, from Eugene Northrop’s Riddles in Mathematics (1945):

  1. Bet $1 on red.
  2. If you win, go to step 6. If you lose, bet $2 on red.
  3. If you win, go to step 6. If you lose, bet $4 on red.
  4. If you win, go to step 6. If you lose, bet $8 on red.
  5. (And so on.)
  6. When you win, you’ll be $1 ahead. Go back to step 1.

“Theoretically, of course, it is possible for the bank to wipe you out financially. Actually, however, runs of more than 10 or 12 successive blacks or reds are extremely rare, and your stake at the twelfth play would be only $2048. When you do win you will, as before, be $1 ahead of the bank. You can then begin all over again. Simple, isn’t it?”

Benardete’s Paradox

Prometheus angers Zeus, who dispatches an army of demons with these instructions:

  • Demon 1: If Prometheus is not dead in one hour, kill him.
  • Demon 2: If Prometheus is not dead in half an hour, kill him.
  • Demon 3: If Prometheus is not dead in quarter of an hour, kill him.

And so on. When Prometheus is found dead, the council of gods is displeased, but they find it impossible to identify the guilty demon — any suspect can point to an infinity of demons who must have acted before him. Must Zeus go free?

The Morning Star Paradox

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Venus-pacific-levelled.jpg
Image: Wikimedia Commons

As it happens, the morning star and the evening star are both Venus–but the solar system might have evolved so that Mercury, for instance, was the brightest star in the morning sky.

Thus the morning star has a property that the evening star does not have: It’s necessarily identical with the morning star.

And if the morning star and the evening star have different properties, then they’re not the same object after all.